← Back to inquiries
Science inquiry · Unit 5Inquiry 5

Conservation in Aotearoa

Evidence for kaitiakitanga decisions

Who is present in this place — and what conservation action does the evidence support?

Start investigation

Science inquiry · Unit 5

Conservation in Aotearoa

Evidence for kaitiakitanga decisions

Living World · Ecology · Human impacts

Wero

Who is present in this place — and what conservation action does the evidence support?

First step

Set up monitoring stations and record detection patterns over time.

What you will show

Consequence reflection on who benefits if your conclusion is wrong.

Local place context

Name the monitoring place and any predator-free or iwi partnership supporting your evidence.

Living World · Ecology · Human impacts

First step

Set up monitoring stations and record detection patterns over time.

Expected outcome

Consequence reflection on who benefits if your conclusion is wrong.

You will design a monitoring system (tracking tunnels, chew cards, or camera traps) and use it to map predator presence around your school. What predators or pests are visiting your site, where, and when — without harming any animal. Detections, locations, dates, and weather.

Five ways you could investigate

Pick one to start — or write your own question. The AI mentor supports you gently inside your investigation.

  1. Idea 1

    Predator detection patterns

    Where are predators detected most often — and what habitat features align?

    Start with this question →
  2. Idea 2

    Bait type comparison

    Does one bait type attract more evidence — with a fair rotation plan?

    Start with this question →
  3. Idea 3

    Seasonal presence

    How does detection change across your monitoring period — and what might drive it?

    Start with this question →
  4. Idea 4

    Human activity impact

    Do counts differ near paths vs quiet zones — cautiously interpreted?

    Start with this question →
  5. Idea 5

    Monitoring method reliability

    When two teams use the same method, how close are their counts?

    Start with this question →

Five things you could build

Fabrication ideas linked to makerspace tools — 3D print, laser cut, Arduino, data products, and more.

  1. Build 1

    Monitoring station marker

    Laser-cut a totem or marker for consistent station identity.

    Open in outcome selector →
  2. Build 2

    Trap stabiliser

    3D print a part that stops traps shifting between checks.

    Open in outcome selector →
  3. Build 3

    Conservation brief

    One-page recommendation for kaitiaki based on your strongest evidence.

    Open in outcome selector →
  4. Build 4

    Field label set

    Vinyl-cut weatherproof labels for each monitoring point.

    Open in outcome selector →
  5. Build 5

    Sensor mount for site

    Position a simple sensor where your evidence says activity peaks.

    Open in outcome selector →

AI mentor (inside your investigation)

No separate mentor page — support appears in your investigation workspace. It starts gentle: short prompts about your research context, data, and analysis. You or your teacher can turn assistance off for unassisted work, or request more help when you need it. It also guides fabrication choices tied to your evidence.

What you will investigate
You will design a monitoring system (tracking tunnels, chew cards, or camera traps) and use it to map predator presence around your school.
What you will collect
Date and time, Station
What you might make or share
A monitoring station design, a map of detections