Professional perspectives survey
Digital Support for Sustained STEM Inquiry
Professional Perspectives Survey | Study 1, 2026
Richard Pedley | PhD Candidate, Monash University
Estimated time: 25–35 minutes
This survey is part of PhD research exploring how digital tools can better support STEM inquiry (STEM stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Maths; inquiry means students investigating a real question themselves, rather than being told the answer) for students aged 11 to 13 in Aotearoa New Zealand. It draws on the perspectives of educators, researchers, and professionals working across learning design, AI, and educational technology.
In sustained STEM inquiry, students investigate real-world questions over an extended period, typically several weeks or longer, rather than in a single lesson. They collect evidence, interpret data, revise their thinking, and build responses based on what they discover.
- Inquiry reasoning means the thinking a student does to make sense of evidence, for example, connecting a claim to data, noticing a pattern, or revising an idea when new evidence appears.
- Inquiry practice means a specific reasoning skill within that process, such as comparing observations, handling uncertainty, or explaining how parts of a system affect each other.
This survey has no right or wrong answers. We are interested in your professional judgement, experience, and honest views. Every question includes a way to indicate it's outside your experience — please use that option rather than guessing.
Before you begin
Watch a short 1 to 2 minute overview of the kind of digital support tool this survey asks about — a tool that tracks a student's inquiry work over time and gives automatic feedback on their reasoning, for example through a summary screen a teacher can check, or automated comments a student receives. This gives you a reference point for later questions. You may also explore the Kōkiri Lab homepage directly — no account or class code needed.
Overview video (~2 minutes). Captions available in the player.
Preview the Kōkiri Lab platform
Not required for the survey. The homepage shows inquiry pathways, community science platforms, and examples of the learning environment this research is exploring — no sign-in required.
Visit Kōkiri Lab homepage →Ethics and data
This survey is part of PhD research at Monash University. Ethics application reference: MUHREC Project ID 38407. A plain-language explanatory statement is available on the research overview page. Your responses are stored securely. No names are associated with responses. You may leave at any time without submitting.
Read the plain-language explanatory statement →
This survey is open to anyone with relevant professional experience. You do not need to have participated in any previous survey.
By continuing you confirm you have read the explanatory statement and consent to participate.